[branded_divider]<\/p>\n
Why Secured Credit? The Case for Inclusion and Revenue<\/h2>\n
At a time when millions of Americans struggle to qualify for traditional unsecured credit\u2014and banks face mounting pressure on debit revenue\u2014secured credit offers solutions for both financial inclusion and revenue strategy.<\/p>\n
Millions of consumers need alternative pathways to credit.<\/h3>\n\n\n\nSecured credit has historically served consumers who could not qualify for traditional unsecured cards. That population remains substantial. More than 45 million Americans are underserved<\/a> or underbanked, representing a meaningful addressable market for accessible credit-building solutions.<\/p>\nAt the same time, high credit card denial rates are pushing subprime and near-prime borrowers toward alternative options. Recent PYMNTS Intelligence research shows that subprime applicants\u2019 denial rates<\/a> are 2.3 times higher than those for super-prime borrowers, making it a significant challenge for subprime consumers to secure conventional credit.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n2.3x<\/h2>\n
Increase in credit card denial rates<\/strong><\/a> for subprime applicants compared with super-prime borrowers<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nSecured credit offers a lower-risk on-ramp to credit building.<\/h3>\n
Consumers who are denied traditional credit increasingly seek alternative pathways<\/a> to establish or repair credit histories, including riskier options such as payday loans and other nontraditional financial services. For subprime consumers, secured credit offers a structured, lower-risk on-ramp to mainstream financial products.<\/p>\nUnlike unsecured<\/em> cards, secured credit<\/em><\/a> requires a deposit that backs the line of credit. This structure reduces default risk for issuers while giving consumers a clear pathway to demonstrate responsible usage. By tying credit access to deposits, secured products allow institutions to extend opportunity while managing exposure.<\/p>\nIn principle, this alignment makes secured credit uniquely positioned to serve both financial inclusion goals and prudent risk management. For institutions seeking to expand access without loosening underwriting standards, secured credit represents a balanced middle ground.<\/p>\n
Revenue pressure is making secured credit strategically attractive.<\/h3>\n
The renewed focus on secured credit is not driven by inclusion alone. It is also shaped by structural changes in issuers\u2019 revenue.<\/p>\n
Debit interchange fees remain subject to regulatory caps established by the Durbin Amendment<\/a> of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, limiting growth potential for debit-based programs. Recent federal court rulings upholding the Federal Reserve\u2019s debit fee framework<\/a> have reinforced the durability of those constraints.<\/p>\nCredit interchange, by contrast, is not subject to the same caps. As a result, secured credit offers banks and FinTechs a revenue stream<\/a> less constrained by regulatory pressure on debit products.<\/p>\nAs financial inclusion becomes both a social and a commercial imperative, secured credit stands out as a product capable of advancing both objectives simultaneously. However, structural barriers within traditional secured credit programs have historically limited adoption and prevented the product from reaching its full potential.<\/p>\n
[branded_divider]<\/p>\n
Why Traditional Secured Credit Feels Broken<\/h2>\n
While the concept of secured credit is compelling, traditional models were built around mechanics suited to a slower, more manual era of banking. Today, those mechanics introduce friction, confusion and operational inefficiency\u2014for consumers and issuers alike.<\/p>\n
Collateral lockups and double funding create structural barriers for consumers.<\/h3>\n\n\n\nTwo<\/p>\n
Number of separate accounts<\/strong><\/a> many legacy secured credit models require customers to fund simultaneously before they have access to credit<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\nTraditional secured credit requires customers to place a deposit equal to the credit limit in a separate collateral account<\/a>. Because that deposit is locked, consumers must also maintain additional funds elsewhere\u2014such as a primary checking account\u2014to repay credit balances. This structure effectively requires consumers to maintain liquidity in two places simultaneously\u2014a dynamic often described as \u201cdouble funding.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nLegacy Secured Credit Model<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Secured credit has historically served consumers who could not qualify for traditional unsecured cards. That population remains substantial. More than 45 million Americans are underserved<\/a> or underbanked, representing a meaningful addressable market for accessible credit-building solutions.<\/p>\n At the same time, high credit card denial rates are pushing subprime and near-prime borrowers toward alternative options. Recent PYMNTS Intelligence research shows that subprime applicants\u2019 denial rates<\/a> are 2.3 times higher than those for super-prime borrowers, making it a significant challenge for subprime consumers to secure conventional credit.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Increase in credit card denial rates<\/strong><\/a> for subprime applicants compared with super-prime borrowers<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Consumers who are denied traditional credit increasingly seek alternative pathways<\/a> to establish or repair credit histories, including riskier options such as payday loans and other nontraditional financial services. For subprime consumers, secured credit offers a structured, lower-risk on-ramp to mainstream financial products.<\/p>\n Unlike unsecured<\/em> cards, secured credit<\/em><\/a> requires a deposit that backs the line of credit. This structure reduces default risk for issuers while giving consumers a clear pathway to demonstrate responsible usage. By tying credit access to deposits, secured products allow institutions to extend opportunity while managing exposure.<\/p>\n In principle, this alignment makes secured credit uniquely positioned to serve both financial inclusion goals and prudent risk management. For institutions seeking to expand access without loosening underwriting standards, secured credit represents a balanced middle ground.<\/p>\n The renewed focus on secured credit is not driven by inclusion alone. It is also shaped by structural changes in issuers\u2019 revenue.<\/p>\n Debit interchange fees remain subject to regulatory caps established by the Durbin Amendment<\/a> of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, limiting growth potential for debit-based programs. Recent federal court rulings upholding the Federal Reserve\u2019s debit fee framework<\/a> have reinforced the durability of those constraints.<\/p>\n Credit interchange, by contrast, is not subject to the same caps. As a result, secured credit offers banks and FinTechs a revenue stream<\/a> less constrained by regulatory pressure on debit products.<\/p>\n As financial inclusion becomes both a social and a commercial imperative, secured credit stands out as a product capable of advancing both objectives simultaneously. However, structural barriers within traditional secured credit programs have historically limited adoption and prevented the product from reaching its full potential.<\/p>\n [branded_divider]<\/p>\n While the concept of secured credit is compelling, traditional models were built around mechanics suited to a slower, more manual era of banking. Today, those mechanics introduce friction, confusion and operational inefficiency\u2014for consumers and issuers alike.<\/p>\n Two<\/p>\n Number of separate accounts<\/strong><\/a> many legacy secured credit models require customers to fund simultaneously before they have access to credit<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Traditional secured credit requires customers to place a deposit equal to the credit limit in a separate collateral account<\/a>. Because that deposit is locked, consumers must also maintain additional funds elsewhere\u2014such as a primary checking account\u2014to repay credit balances. This structure effectively requires consumers to maintain liquidity in two places simultaneously\u2014a dynamic often described as \u201cdouble funding.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n2.3x<\/h2>\n
Secured credit offers a lower-risk on-ramp to credit building.<\/h3>\n
Revenue pressure is making secured credit strategically attractive.<\/h3>\n
Why Traditional Secured Credit Feels Broken<\/h2>\n
Collateral lockups and double funding create structural barriers for consumers.<\/h3>\n
Legacy Secured Credit Model<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"Shankar](\"https:\/\/www.pymnts.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Shankar-Pandravada-headshot.jpeg\")
<\/div>\n